Skip to main content

Civil society calls on the European Parliament to condemn pressures on #Disinfo2026


On 7-8 October, EU DisinfoLab, an independent European civil society organisation, convened the biggest European conference on disinformation in Vilnius, Lithuania, with 650 participants from civil society, media, academia, tech companies and government institutions. Following pressure from the US government, multiple sponsors removed their logos from the conference at the last minute.

At Disinfo2026, the latest trends facing the counter-disinformation community were discussed, including a panel entitled “US as a FIMI threat: acknowledge, adapt, push back”, which drew ire from the US government. In the run-up to the conference, the US State Department called on EU Member States and Canada to withdraw their support for the conference and also put pressure on the organisers to change the agenda, despite it being public for months prior to the conference.

In recent years, the US government has openly pressured the EU to backtrack on its digital regulation. It has even attempted to intimidate individuals by imposing sanctions – a move to silence democracy defenders. 

The EU should withstand these pressures. The European External Action Service should not have given in to pressure from the US, thereby publicly distancing itself from European researchers and civil society and an open debate on challenges and threats. This is particularly surprising given the institution’s long-term commitment to fighting foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI) – a term the EEAS coined itself. Conference sponsoring does not imply agreement with the full content, but allows for editorial autonomy of the organiser and the ability of participants and speakers to present and discuss freely. 

Debate and disagreement are fundamentals of democracy. Independently organised conferences should not be forced to reflect the EU’s official line, as implied by the EEAS last week. Notably, the other main sponsors, the government of France and GoVilnius, did not withdraw their sponsorship.

We call on the European Parliament to adopt a resolution in support of free debate and urging EU institutions to withstand undue pressure by foreign actors – regardless of its origin – that targets democratic infrastructure and values. 

EU institutions should reaffirm their support to European researchers, civil society, media and others fighting for Europe’s information integrity. This is particularly important at a time when financial support for civil society is being reduced drastically, further impeding its work.

Signatories

  1. Adam Fivenson, American University, USA
  2. Dr Adela Levis, University of Michigan, USA
  3. AI Forensics
  4. Alberto Fittarelli
  5. Alliance4Europe
  6. American Sunlight Project
  7. Ana Fernández Inguanzo, Centre for Digitalisation, Democracy and Innovation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  8. Antoine de Gunzbourg, Open Source Intelligence & Strategy, MELETA
  9. Association of European Journalists in Belgium
  10. Avoin yhteiskunta ry, Faktabaari
  11. Benoît Thieulin, President of the “La Warroom.AI” agency, specialising in informational and cognitive warfare. Former président of the French digital Committee.
  12. Bits of Freedom
  13. Brendan Spillane, University College Dublin
  14. Camille Grenier, Executive Director, Forum on Information and Democracy
  15. Carlos Entrena Serrano, Centre for Digitalisation, Democracy and Innovation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  16. Carolina Scarton, University of Sheffield
  17. CEE Digital Democracy Watch
  18. CeMAS – Center für Monitoring, Analyse und Strategie
  19. CheckFirst
  20. Christian Leffler, former Deputy Secretary General, EEAS
  21. Civil Liberties Union for Europe (Liberties)
  22. Community Media Forum Europe (CMFE)
  23. Daniel Scarnecchia, viz., Skywatch
  24. Defend Democracy
  25. Demagog Association (Poland)
  26. Demagog.sk (Slovakia)
  27. Democracy Reporting International
  28. Denis Teyssou
  29. Deutsche Vereinigung für Datenschutz e.V. (DVD), Deutschland
  30. Državljan D / Citizen D, Slovenia
  31. EDGE Foundation
  32. EDMO –  Baltic Engagement Centre for Combating Information Disorders (BECID)
  33. EDMO – Bulgarian Romanian Observatory of Digital Media (BROD)
  34. EDMO – European Digital Media Observatory
  35. EDMO – European Digital Media Observatory for Belgium and Luxembourg (BELUX)
  36. EDMO – Hungarian Digital Media Observatory (HDMO)
  37. EDMO Ireland
  38. EDMO – Mediterranean Digital Media Observatory (MedDMO)
  39. Efthimios Hamilos, Media Analysis, Verification and Retrieval (MeVer) group, CERTH-ITI
  40. Dr Eirliani Abdul Rahman, University of Mannheim, Germany
  41. Elbarlament
  42. Election-Watch.EU
  43. Electronic Frontier Norway
  44. Eleni Alevritou, Consumer Association the Quality of Life -EKPIZO, Greece
  45. Dr Emma L. Briant, University of Notre Dame, USA
  46. Prof. Dr Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London
  47. European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ECNL)
  48. European Exchange
  49. European Fact-Checking Standards Network
  50. European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  51. European Partnership for Democracy
  52. Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR)
  53. Free Press Unlimited
  54. Fundación Maldita.es
  55. Geoffroy Patriarche, Engage – Research Center for Publicness in Contemporary Communication, UCLouvain
  56. Georgios Terzis, Centre for Digitalisation, Democracy and Innovation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  57. Global Media Registry (GMR)
  58. Global Voices
  59. HateAid
  60. Health Action International
  61. INPACT / All Eyes On Wagner
  62. Irini Katsirea, University of Sheffield
  63. Irish Council for Civil Liberties
  64. Jessica Galissaire, Senior Policy Researcher, interface – tech analysis and policy ideas for Europe
  65. Juli Bakagianni, Media Analysis, Verification and Retrieval (MeVer) group, CERTH-ITI
  66. Kalina Bontcheva, University of Sheffield and Centre for Freedom of the Media (CFOM)
  67. Dr Keith Peter Kiely, GATE Institute, Sofia, Bulgaria
  68. Kim Holmberg, University of Turku
  69. Kofi Annan Foundation
  70. Laura Kaun, Head of EU and UK Public Affairs, CCDH Brussels
  71. Lena-Maria Böswald, Senior Policy Researcher, interface – tech analysis and policy ideas for Europe
  72. Maia Scott 
  73. Marie Bohner
  74. Mike Thelwall, University of Sheffield
  75. Nicolas Hénin
  76. Nikos Sarris, Media Analysis, Verification and Retrieval (MeVer) group, CERTH-ITI
  77. ObSINT ry
  78. Open Terms Archive
  79. Partnerships for Integrity (P4I) 
  80. People vs Big Tech
  81. Politiscope
  82. QuotaClimat
  83. Ralph Hertwig, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, BerlinÅsa Wikforss, Stockholm University
  84. Ranking Digital Rights
  85. RNW Media
  86. Robin Berjon, Supramundane Agency
  87. Sabri Derinöz, Engage – Research Center for Publicness in Contemporary Communication, UCLouvain
  88. Sophie Pornschlegel, University of Maastricht
  89. Stephan Lewandowsky, University of Bristol
  90. SUPERRR Lab, Berlin
  91. Symeon Papadopoulos, Media Analysis, Verification and Retrieval (MeVer) group, CERTH-ITI
  92. Transparency International EU
  93. Trisha Meyer, Centre for Digitalisation, Democracy and Innovation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  94. Vrijschrift.org
  95. WHAT TO FIX

Last update: 27 October 2026

© European Union 2026 – Source : EP