skip to Main Content

A case study reviewing European democracy support

Armenia has in some ways been a classic example of a country caught in a grey zone or hybrid regime, with its mixture of features of democratic and authoritarian systems. In concert with the rest of the Eurasian region, Armenia had been viewed in recent years as a country subject to the gradual advance of authoritarian governance. The current government led by Nikol Pashinyan is in a remarkably dominant position – similar to those that came before, albeit with significantly higher levels of public support.

The 2018 Velvet Revolution could be seen as an entirely unexpected event but it was also possible thanks to the multitude of protests in the country in recent years that received significantly less international attention. The elements of political competition within the system were vital in allowing for change. While the shadow cast by the revolution conditions any contemporary analysis of Armenian politics, it is vital to recognise that the fundamental challenges still remain the same. It is highly unlikely that democratic development will flourish without a greater dispersal of political and economic power.

The paper outlines a series of recommendations for updating and improving European efforts to support democracy in Armenia. It was commissioned by the European Partnership for Democracy in the context of a ‘Review of European democracy support’. Armenia was chosen among a series of country cases due to its geographical location (in the EU neighbourhood), ties to a major power (Russia) and the changes brought about by the 2018 revolution. The recommendations from the paper are split into four thematic areas, each containing specific recommendations. These are:

  • Strengthening the political and financial cooperation between Armenia and the EU
  • Complementing successful on-going efforts of political coordination with an increased focus on programmatic cooperation between European states
  • Developing the necessary knowledge to properly understand the fundamental drivers of political change in Armenia
  • Increasing support to non-state actors, such as independent media, political parties, parliaments and civil society


More news

Civil Society Statement on Democratic Digital Infrastructure
Joint Civil Society and Democracy Organisations’ Priorities for the Defence of Democracy Package
Joint Civil Society and Democracy Organisations’ Priorities for the Defence of Democracy Package
Transparency of Media Ownership within the EMFA
A Menu of Commitments for Youth Participation
Urgent need for a long term approach in Georgia
Statement in the EU Parliament CULT Committee on the European Media Freedom Act
Transparency of State Advertising in the proposal for a European Media Freedom Act (EMFA)
Joint statement on the European Commission’s 2023 Rule of Law Report
Open Letter to Parliament on the European Media Freedom Act
European Democracy Support Annual Review 2022
EPD’s assessment of the European Media Freedom Act proposal
Joint statement on Article 17 of the European Media Freedom Act
Back To Top